Formulate Labs: building the engine, not just the app
Most teams aren’t slow because they lack talent.
They’re slow because every project starts from scratch.
New repo. New patterns. New decisions. New UI inconsistencies. New auth quirks. New deployment drift. New “we should really standardize this” conversations that never quite happen.
That’s not a productivity issue. That’s an infrastructure issue.
Formulate Labs exists to solve that at the root: by building engines—reusable frameworks and scaffolding—so shipping becomes the default outcome, not a heroic event.
The hidden cost of “just build the app”
When you only build the surface layer, you borrow time from your future.
You can get a demo working quickly, but you pay later with:
- brittle systems
- inconsistent UX
- duplicated effort
- fragile deployments
- ad hoc analytics
- a growing pile of “we’ll fix it later”
“Later” becomes a second job.
The alternative is to build an engine:
- primitives you trust
- conventions that remove choices
- scaffolding that makes good defaults automatic
- a UI system that keeps taste consistent
- workflows that make operations sustainable
The engine is what lets a business ship repeatedly without collapsing under its own weight.
A concrete example: the difference between a feature and a framework
Say you want to add “waitlist capture” to a site.
The feature approach:
- slap a form on the page
- send an email
- store it somewhere
- done
The engine approach:
- standardized form components
- validation and spam controls
- consistent analytics events
- a single pipeline for leads across products
- dashboard or export patterns
- clear privacy handling
- reusable integration points (Sheets, CRM, email sequences)
Now the second product gets waitlist capture in an afternoon—not a week. And it behaves the same way everywhere.
That’s compounding.
What Formulate builds
Formulate is a studio, yes. But the output isn’t just apps.
It’s:
- repeatable architecture patterns
- UI systems that keep taste coherent
- automation primitives for common workflows
- reusable “engines” for domains we touch often (ops workflows, triage, intake, scoring, content, etc.)
So when a new idea shows up, you’re not starting from zero—you’re starting from a foundation.
What I believe
Starting from scratch is a tax you don’t need to pay.
Consistency is a form of speed.
Good defaults are more valuable than good intentions.
Infrastructure is what turns shipping into a habit.
Systems should outgrow their first use case.
What this looks like in practice
When we build under Formulate, we aim for:
- A clear product shape: what’s the smallest loop that closes?
- Primitives first: auth, data models, roles, permissions, events
- UI system: typography, spacing, components, motion rules
- Operational workflows: onboarding, support, analytics, billing paths
- Automation hooks: the common “boring” stuff is pre-solved
- Repeatability: the second build is faster than the first
That’s the standard: each product leaves behind infrastructure.
Man’s reach exceeds his grasp—fine. That’s the game. But the grasp can exceed imagination if you build engines instead of one-offs.
Build the things you wish existed; one day one of them will outgrow your expectations. The surest way to make that happen is to build the engine that keeps shipping after the first release.
Related Projects
Subscribe to the Build Log
I write about one deep-dive per month. No spam, just systems.